Journal: Molecular Oncology
Article Title: Patient therapy outcome modeling in cancer organoids is improved by cancer‐associated fibroblasts and organoid assembly convolution
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.70282
Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison between standard and experimental drug combinations in the organoid biobank and the impact of cancer‐associated fibroblasts (CAFs) on the patient‐derived organoid (PDO) sensitivity to anticancer therapies in vitro (A–C) Relative viability of patient‐derived pancreatic, colon, and gastric cancer organoids, respectively, treated with FOLFIRINOX; nab‐paclitaxel and gemcitabine; FOLFOX; FOLFIRI; FLOT; carfilzomib (CFZ) with VER‐155008 and nelfinavir (NLV); MKT‐077 with selinexor; and CB‐6644 with selinexor using indicated concentrations. Viability was measured using ATPlite 72 h after drug addition to the culture. Each symbol indicates viability of a single patient‐derived organoid culture (for pancreatic cancer n = 9 individual patients, for colon cancer n = 7 individual patients, for gastric cancer n = 7 individual patients; each is an average of three technical replicates) relative to the control, with horizontal lines linking the same sample under different treatments. Dashed lines indicate average, normalized solvent control levels. Statistical analysis of difference between sample‐matched PDO populations was performed using Friedman test, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. (D–F) Comparison of the relative viability results for pancreatic, colon, and gastric cancer organoids, respectively, co‐cultured directly with CAFs or as a monoculture, treated with indicated drug compositions at indicated concentrations. Viability was measured using ATPlite 72 h after drug addition to the culture. Dashed lines indicate average, normalized solvent control levels. Each symbol indicates viability of a single patient‐derived PDO (for pancreatic cancer n = 8 individual patients, for colon cancer n = 8 individual patients, for gastric cancer n = 8 individual patients; each is an average of three technical replicates) relative to the control, with horizontal lines linking the same sample in a monoculture and a direct CAF co‐culture. Dashed lines indicate average, normalized solvent control levels. Statistical analysis of difference between sample‐matched PDO populations with and without CAFs was performed using two‐way ANOVA with Fisher LSD post‐test, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. Lower panels: Light microscopy images of pancreatic, colon, and gastric cancer organoids, respectively, co‐cultured with CAFs 72 h post treatment with indicated drugs. Red arrows point toward the organoids while CAFs represent the lower, more dispersed layer of the culture. Scale bar, 50 μm. All photographs are representative to n = 3 experiment replicates.
Article Snippet: Thw following drugs were used in this study: Selinexor (HY‐17536); MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA), MKT‐077 (HY‐15096); MedChemExpress, CB‐6644 (HY‐114429); MedChemExpress, Carfilzomib (HY‐10455); MedChemExpress, VER‐155008 (HY‐10941); MedChemExpress, Nelfinavir (HY‐15287); MedChemExpress, Nab‐paclitaxel (HY‐P99974); MedChemExpress, Gemcitabine (HY‐17026); MedChemExpress, 5‐Fluorouracil (HY‐90006); MedChemExpress, Oxaliplatin (HY‐17371); MedChemExpress, Irinotecan (HY‐16562); MedChemExpress, Leucovorin (HY‐17556); MedChemExpress, and Docetaxel (HY‐B0011); MedChemExpress.
Techniques: Comparison, Derivative Assay, In Vitro, Control, Solvent, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay, Light Microscopy